In-House vs Outsourced Controller for Medical Practices

Managing the financial health of your medical practice is no small feat. In fact, 92% of medical group leaders reported increased operating expenses in 2024 compared to the previous year, according to a recent MGMA Stat poll. Rising costs, complex reimbursement models, and ever-changing regulations make financial management one of the most pressing challenges for healthcare practices.
One of the most critical decisions? Determining who should oversee your financial operations. Choosing between an in-house controller or an outsourced solution can significantly impact both your daily workflows and long-term success. Let’s explore both options and how they can shape your practice’s financial future.
Understanding the Controller's Role in Healthcare
A controller plays a critical role in the financial health of a medical practice, serving as a strategic partner in financial reporting, compliance, and overall fiscal management. They oversee the accuracy and integrity of financial statements, ensure compliance with industry regulations, and provide insights that drive strategic decision-making. In healthcare, controllers must navigate complex reporting requirements, track financial performance across multiple service lines, and adapt to evolving regulatory standards—all while helping the practice maintain long-term financial stability.
Advantages of an In-House Controller
Many medical practices traditionally lean toward hiring an in-house controller, attracted by the benefits of having dedicated financial leadership on-site. This approach offers several distinct advantages:
- Direct oversight of day-to-day financial operations
- Immediate availability for decision-making and problem-solving
- Deep understanding of practice-specific operations and culture
- Hands-on staff management and training
However, this option also comes with significant drawbacks. The full cost of an in-house controller extends beyond salary to include benefits, training, and professional development. Practices must also plan for coverage during vacations or illness, and potentially face knowledge gaps in specialized areas of healthcare finance.
Advantages of Outsourcing
Outsourced controller services have gained traction as medical practices seek more flexible, scalable solutions. This option provides:
- Access to a team of healthcare financial specialists
- Built-in coverage and continuity of service
- Advanced technology and best practices
- Scalable support that grows with your practice
While outsourcing offers these advantages, practices should consider potential challenges such as remote communication coordination and cultural integration.
Making the Right Decision
Choosing between an in-house controller and an outsourced solution depends on your practice's unique needs. Use this assessment guide to evaluate which option might be the better fit for your situation.
Practice Size & Growth
Consider In-House When: |
Consider Outsourcing When: |
Your practice has multiple providers or locations requiring daily financial oversight |
You're a smaller practice with straightforward operations |
You have a high volume of daily transactions |
Your practice is experiencing rapid growth and needs scalable support |
You need someone physically present to manage a large financial team |
Your needs fluctuate seasonally or as you add new services |
Technology Infrastructure
Consider In-House When: |
Consider Outsourcing When: |
You've already invested in robust financial software |
You want access to advanced financial systems without capital investment |
You have IT resources to support financial systems |
You need help modernizing outdated financial processes |
You prefer customized solutions specific to your practice |
You want continual technology updates without managing them yourself |
Budget Considerations
Consider In-House When: |
Consider Outsourcing When: |
You can afford the full compensation package (salary, benefits, training) |
You want predictable monthly expenses without hidden costs |
You have resources for coverage during vacation/illness |
You need to avoid the recruitment and turnover costs |
You've accounted for ongoing professional development costs |
You want flexible service levels that can adapt to your budget |
Staff Structure
Consider In-House When: |
Consider Outsourcing When: |
You need someone to build and train a financial team |
Your team is experienced but needs strategic oversight |
Daily hands-on leadership is essential to your operations |
You need specialized expertise for specific projects |
Your culture benefits from face-to-face financial leadership |
Your team is comfortable with virtual collaboration tools |
Future Goals
Consider In-House When: |
Consider Outsourcing When: |
You're planning major expansion requiring dedicated oversight |
You want perspective from experts who've guided multiple practices |
You're preparing for complex negotiations or transactions |
You need flexibility to scale services as your practice evolves |
You want to develop internal leadership for long-term growth |
You want access to emerging best practices across the industry |
Every practice's situation is unique, but seeing how others have approached this decision can provide valuable insights. Here are examples of how different medical practices evaluated their needs and arrived at the controller solution that worked best for them:
Case 1: Growing Primary Care Practice
A 3-physician practice experiencing rapid growth chose outsourced controller services to gain immediate expertise without waiting through a lengthy hiring process. The scalable solution allowed them to add locations without needing to restructure their financial team.
Case 2: Established Specialty Practice
A long-standing specialty practice transitioning to new leadership chose a hybrid approach—outsourcing strategic financial oversight while maintaining an in-house bookkeeper for daily operations, giving them both specialized expertise and operational continuity.
Decide Which is Right for You with Lutz
Successfully implementing the right controller solution requires experienced guidance and deep industry knowledge. At Lutz, our private practice team understands the unique challenges of the healthcare environment and can help design approaches that align with your organization's specific needs and goals. Contact us today to explore how we can help optimize your practice's financial operations.

- Achiever, Significance, Focus, Discipline, Competition
Katie Blycker
Katie Blycker, Client Advisory Services Manager, began her career in 2016. She has developed extensive expertise in outsourced accounting and healthcare consulting, building on her early experience in tax.
Focusing on providing comprehensive financial services to independent medical practices, Katie excels in benchmarking analysis, provider compensation plans, and financial statement review. Katie's passion lies in simplifying complex financial data for her clients, interpreting key metrics, and conveying crucial information. Her disciplined approach and drive for achievement enable her to deliver high-quality, tailored solutions that meet each client's unique needs.
Katie lives in Omaha, NE, with her husband Bryce and daughter Blair. Outside the office, you will find her spending time with her family, golfing, and reading.
Recent News & Insights
In-House vs Outsourced Controller for Medical Practices
Are You Prepared? Financial Access Checklist for Spouses
Mind What Matters... Focusing on What You Can Control
Maximizing Efficiency with AI and Microsoft Copilot

